Blogs & Discussions

NOT YET A MEMBER OF THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT'S ALTERNATIVE TO FACEBOOK? CLICK HERE TO SET UP A FREE SOCIAL PROFILE NOW!

Many of us have questioned what causedRoberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as repo..., and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question. 


In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.

In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story. 

Drudge did an article in 2005
http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-inves...

The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”

Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”

Were the Children Adopted from Ireland?

Read more, click here.

MY COMMENTARY:

If these allegations prove to be true, Roberts could be kicked off of the Supreme Court and possibly the ruling on ObamaCare overturned.  However, this poses another dilemma...

This would leave another open seat on the Supreme Court and another Obama appointee.  Seems to me we're damned if we do ... we're damned if we don't ... we lose again either way!

 

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
" I believe we all have that idea in what he is up to. He will pay the price for sure."
25 minutes ago
Rudy posted blog posts
1 hour ago
Brock Peterman commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"Everyday the traitor in chief is in office his list of crimes grows as do the accessories keeping them there.  We will get you all eventually, there is no statute of limitations on your crimes."
3 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
Sure smells like school spirit:High School Madness:  Firesign Theatre Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) files a motion to oust House Speaker John Boehner:Mr. Meadows, North Carolina Republican, filed a motion to “vacate the chair,” which could force a no-con…
7 hours ago
Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Tuesday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"I must of missed that."
21 hours ago
Brock Peterman commented on Rudy's blog post Tuesday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"Didn't you hear Lerch (Kerry) the other day trying to deflect on the rise in human trafficking (slavery)?"
yesterday
Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Tuesday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"So now they can get free benefits from taxpayers.
They are so proud of him.
Yes, we are doomed and they are here."
yesterday
MOTUS posted a discussion
First order of business today: Results of the first two playoffs in Round One of the Sweet Sixteen:Bracket A: Trump kiboshed Lucky Lindsey’s chance of becoming the country’s first historic white gay president.Bracket B: Rick Perry proved you have to…
yesterday
More…

PAN on Facebook