Blogs & Discussions

NOT YET A MEMBER OF THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT'S ALTERNATIVE TO FACEBOOK? CLICK HERE TO SET UP A FREE SOCIAL PROFILE NOW!

Many of us have questioned what causedRoberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as repo..., and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question. 


In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.

In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story. 

Drudge did an article in 2005
http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-inves...

The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”

Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”

Were the Children Adopted from Ireland?

Read more, click here.

MY COMMENTARY:

If these allegations prove to be true, Roberts could be kicked off of the Supreme Court and possibly the ruling on ObamaCare overturned.  However, this poses another dilemma...

This would leave another open seat on the Supreme Court and another Obama appointee.  Seems to me we're damned if we do ... we're damned if we don't ... we lose again either way!

 

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Friday ~ The Front Page Cover
"I'm afraid so..."
2 hours ago
Brock Peterman commented on Rudy's blog post Friday ~ The Front Page Cover
"Another day in purgatory, one totally created by Democrats and Rhinos."
6 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
Note: you may have to embiggen the text to read the tiny print. Apologies, butt then again, it’s not supposed to be easy to read the fine print.Poor old over-the-Hilz, not only did she get schlonged again by Bernie last night, butt she continues to…
6 hours ago
Rudy posted a blog post
The Front Page Cover 2016             The turth is the gold of today Featuring:Israel finally starts pursuing domestic andforeign-funded 'fifth columnists'William Booth & Ruth Eglash.~~~. Who's Up for Another nObama Lecture on 'Who  We Are'?   In a…
6 hours ago
Larry Holland posted a discussion
With America's war on cops, and the blacklivesonlymatter crowd calling for police officers to be killed, maybe this might change their attitude towards police? NO probably not!A Columbus Ohio police officer saved a man's life who had been shot in th…
10 hours ago
Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Thursday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"Boy is that the truth."
20 hours ago
Brock Peterman commented on Rudy's blog post Thursday AM ~ The Front Page Cover
"The drums of war have been playing for some time now, though rather faintly.  They are gaining in tempo and volume.  It is only a matter of time before it is a deafening drumbeat that no one can ignore."
21 hours ago
Rudy posted blog posts
yesterday
More…

PAN on Facebook