Blogs & Discussions

NOT YET A MEMBER OF THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT'S ALTERNATIVE TO FACEBOOK? CLICK HERE TO SET UP A FREE SOCIAL PROFILE NOW!



Under the guise of shielding journalists from prosecution for failing to divulge their sources, Chuck Schumer is sponsoring and pushing a bill to register and license "chosen" journalists; that is, if this passes, the government will decide who IS a journalist (and has protection) and who isn't (and doesn't).

Can you say (Mafia-like) protection racket?  How much will it "cost" to dance with the vampires?

Matthew Boyle at Breitbart has the scoop today from Senator John Cornyn, who is "...lambasting a media 'shield law' proposed by New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer, potentially imperling its shot at passage..."

It's called the "Free Flow of Information Act," which has already "...passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, and he recently said he already has the 60 votes needed to pass the bill on the floor, according to Boyle and quotes Schumer saying:  “...We’ll get a few more Republicans, not many more, but we have the 60 votes..."

But, Boyle reports a Cornyn retort:

"...If he had the votes to pass it, it already would have been passed...This isn’t about passing legislation, this is about distracting the public’s attention and changing the subject from the failed policies of this administration. I think you could put this in that same category...”

According to Boyle:

"...Schumer's proposal would exempt a “covered journalist” from subpoenas and other legal requirements to expose their confidential sources in leak investigations and other areas. Other lawmakers have proposed similar ideas in the past, but the effort gained new momentum after a series of revelations about controversial tactics the Justice Department was using to target journalists...For instance, the Department of Justice secretly monitored Fox News reporter James Rosen in the course of a leak investigation, even claiming in a court filing he was a subject of investigation himself. In another instance, the government had secretly monitored numerous phone lines used by the Associated Press, including one in the U.S. Capitol..."

Boyle nails it with this.  According to Cornyn:

"...'They want to pick and choose which journalists are covered,' the Texan Republican told Breitbart News. 'In other words, if you’re a blogger they might not cover you, but if you work for the New York Times they might. Given the changes in the way we get information and the way we consume news, that really smacks to me in essence of government licensing who’s an official "journalist" for the purposes of a shield law and who’s not. If there is one thing I can glean from the First Amendment, it is that government should not be in the business of licensing the news media.'... In practice, defining who is considered a 'journalist' and protected under the law from having to disclose confidential sources is a thorny legal problem. On the one hand, the law's drafters don't want to provide blanket immunity to everyone. But anointing a government-approved class of scribes cuts against the nature of journalism, which almost by definition is frequently critical of the government..."

So, are you a writer, blogger, patriot, defender of the Constitution?  If so, and you are not licensed by the government under the stipulations of this legislation, you will not have "protected" status and are subject to prosecution, if the government presses you for your confidential sources and you do not provide them.

Think that will stifle free speech and "Freedom of the Press?"

The annointed "media," now exposed as the propaganda arm of the government elitists, already goose-steps in cadence with the Obamistas.  Note how easily they concede to a news blackout from the Obama administration.  Currently some journalists complain that Obama photographs are "staged."  Indeed, except for what independent/unaligned media captures outside the White House and from their screened propagandists, Published Obama photos taken at the White House, are those that are "approved."


Unless independent and constitutionalist journalists and patriot Constitutional protectors unite rapidly to defeat this, the ONLY media chosen by the government will have "protected" status and this will put an end to journalistic Freedom.

See the Boyle article HERE... 

Vanguard of Freedom


Enhanced by Zemanta
Email me when people comment –

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

Lloyd Marcus posted a blog post
A black liberal columnist made the point in his article that the future of the GOP rests on it getting rid of its conservatives.  Then, the GOP can modernize; attract more young voters of color by embracing open borders, amnesty, abortion and all th…
3 hours ago
Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday Morning - The Front Page Cover
"Me too!"
17 hours ago
Marlene replied to MOTUS's discussion Appellate Court De-animates the Dream
"The DREAM of a few million is to LIVE OFF THE SWEAT OF 300 MILLION AMERICANS.
WHAT MAKES THESE CRIMINALS SO GREAT THAT THEY SHOULD BE CARRIED THROUGH LIFE. 

THEY NEED TO GO HOME AND FIX THEIR OWN PROBLEMS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
THAT GOES FOR THE MUZ…"
18 hours ago
Marlene commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday Morning - The Front Page Cover
"Senator Jeff Sessions is the man.  He's the only one.  Wouldn't give a red cent for the rest of them combined."
18 hours ago
Larry Holland commented on Larry Holland's blog post Are You Kidding Me? If This Isn't The Pot Calling The Kettle Black!
"I didn't even realize the link to the Clinton Crime Family and Hitlary in this story until I listened to Rush today. The DOJ cited racketeering and money laundering as the reason for the indictments
of FIFA, but what about Clinton Crime Inc, aren't…"
23 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
Bummer!A split federal appeals court on Tuesday let stand a lower court's ruling that has stymied Obama administration plans to shield up to 5 million people - including young immigrants known as "Dreamers" – from deportation. - LA TimesWell that’s…
yesterday
Rudy commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday Morning - The Front Page Cover
"No doubts about that."
yesterday
Brock Peterman commented on Rudy's blog post Wednesday Morning - The Front Page Cover
"Kudos Mr. Sessions!  We need more Americans like you sir."
yesterday
More…

PAN on Facebook