Blogs & Discussions


Under the guise of shielding journalists from prosecution for failing to divulge their sources, Chuck Schumer is sponsoring and pushing a bill to register and license "chosen" journalists; that is, if this passes, the government will decide who IS a journalist (and has protection) and who isn't (and doesn't).

Can you say (Mafia-like) protection racket?  How much will it "cost" to dance with the vampires?

Matthew Boyle at Breitbart has the scoop today from Senator John Cornyn, who is "...lambasting a media 'shield law' proposed by New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer, potentially imperling its shot at passage..."

It's called the "Free Flow of Information Act," which has already "...passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in September, and he recently said he already has the 60 votes needed to pass the bill on the floor, according to Boyle and quotes Schumer saying:  “...We’ll get a few more Republicans, not many more, but we have the 60 votes..."

But, Boyle reports a Cornyn retort:

"...If he had the votes to pass it, it already would have been passed...This isn’t about passing legislation, this is about distracting the public’s attention and changing the subject from the failed policies of this administration. I think you could put this in that same category...”

According to Boyle:

"...Schumer's proposal would exempt a “covered journalist” from subpoenas and other legal requirements to expose their confidential sources in leak investigations and other areas. Other lawmakers have proposed similar ideas in the past, but the effort gained new momentum after a series of revelations about controversial tactics the Justice Department was using to target journalists...For instance, the Department of Justice secretly monitored Fox News reporter James Rosen in the course of a leak investigation, even claiming in a court filing he was a subject of investigation himself. In another instance, the government had secretly monitored numerous phone lines used by the Associated Press, including one in the U.S. Capitol..."

Boyle nails it with this.  According to Cornyn:

"...'They want to pick and choose which journalists are covered,' the Texan Republican told Breitbart News. 'In other words, if you’re a blogger they might not cover you, but if you work for the New York Times they might. Given the changes in the way we get information and the way we consume news, that really smacks to me in essence of government licensing who’s an official "journalist" for the purposes of a shield law and who’s not. If there is one thing I can glean from the First Amendment, it is that government should not be in the business of licensing the news media.'... In practice, defining who is considered a 'journalist' and protected under the law from having to disclose confidential sources is a thorny legal problem. On the one hand, the law's drafters don't want to provide blanket immunity to everyone. But anointing a government-approved class of scribes cuts against the nature of journalism, which almost by definition is frequently critical of the government..."

So, are you a writer, blogger, patriot, defender of the Constitution?  If so, and you are not licensed by the government under the stipulations of this legislation, you will not have "protected" status and are subject to prosecution, if the government presses you for your confidential sources and you do not provide them.

Think that will stifle free speech and "Freedom of the Press?"

The annointed "media," now exposed as the propaganda arm of the government elitists, already goose-steps in cadence with the Obamistas.  Note how easily they concede to a news blackout from the Obama administration.  Currently some journalists complain that Obama photographs are "staged."  Indeed, except for what independent/unaligned media captures outside the White House and from their screened propagandists, Published Obama photos taken at the White House, are those that are "approved."

Unless independent and constitutionalist journalists and patriot Constitutional protectors unite rapidly to defeat this, the ONLY media chosen by the government will have "protected" status and this will put an end to journalistic Freedom.

See the Boyle article HERE... 

Vanguard of Freedom

Enhanced by Zemanta
Email me when people comment –

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

MOTUS posted a discussion
The Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner is normally a genteel gathering of the New York elite; political adversaries roast each other in good humor to raise money for a Catholic children’s charity. This year however they got Trumped. There wa…
10 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
It’s late and I know many of you get up early. So this isn’t a post-debait wrap up (srdem65 promised to do that for us, if her head didn’t explode while watching) just an early morning open thread with a few random observations:Wrap up from the Fox…
MOTUS posted a discussion
I must interrupt the presidential election process to bring you this important reflection on the Obama’s last, historic State Dinner; this one for the Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi and his wife, Agnese Landini. So naturally we wore Italian (Ve…
MOTUS posted a discussion
I know this will come as a surprise: evidence emerges that journalists tend to put their money where there mouthpieces are:Irony is not dead after all, as displayed by infamous Washington Post correspondent Chris Cillizza:If IowaHawk hadn’t beaten m…
MOTUS posted a discussion
We all knew there was collusion between Hillary’s campaign and the media. Wikileaks confirmed it and now Sharyl Atkinson has documented it. And how could you be sentient and not think there was collusion between Hillary’s campaign and the DOJ?And th…
MOTUS posted a discussion
In 2013 Hillary Clinton was paid $675,000 for three speeches she gave to Goldman Sachs.I’ve scanned through then as much as I could without poking my eyes out. Never mind the “pulbic/private” positions – which I know are disturbing in themselves but…
MOTUS posted a discussion
Hillary Clinton used variations of 'I don't recall' 21 times when asked 25 questions under oath about how she deleted 33,000 State Department emails.Sworn written testimony obtained by Judicial Watch show the Democratic presidential candidate dodged…
Oct 15
MOTUS posted a discussion
Drip, drip, drip. Everyday more Wikileaks leaking out, demonstrating the degree of Clinton corruption that the MSM choses to ignore in favor of their own trumped up charges of sexual harassment against The Donald. Anything to fire up their base with…
Oct 14

PAN on Facebook