Blogs & Discussions



S. Lindsey's picture

Many people confuse their OPINIONS and VIEWS with facts.. Their opinion and/or view may indeed be a fact; however facts have to be able to be proven and some basis other than an opinion and a belief..
”A fact is a pragmatic truth, a statement that can, at least in theory, be checked and either confirmed or denied. Facts are often contrasted with opinions and beliefs, statements which are held to be true, but are not amenable to pragmatic confirmation or denial (Wikipedia)”
Let me explain.. Here is a fact..
"The Omnibus bill had over 8000 earmarks "special projects" imbedded in it"
This can be checked and substantiated from sources considered to be non-partisan..

Some bloggers seemed to deny the fact that the Earmarks where there.. others attempt to obfuscate the issue with a series of minor details.. never really addressing the issue of the Earmarks themselves..

Arguing against or for a fact:

Now going back to the definition of the word FACT view here the differing points the Arguments against the points.. Note I said arguments not counter points.. Points are generally accepted as a fact if backed up with a proven base. Counter Points as well as points can also be fact, based on proven points.. The difference here is weight.. the weight of the argument balanced by the effectiveness of the Counter Point.. in other words Validity. If a point is issued as a fact.. it must have a valid source or universally known to be true.. i.e. “ The Earth is round” We can prove this to be true by looking at Satellite data or accept the universal truth. Simply saying the Earth is flat is not a Counter-point it is only an argument not based in fact..

How to Break an Argument
Let me explain Breaking the Argument.. When arguing a particular fact.. To break it you must do more than just dispute it or fail to agree.. You must present counter facts (points) with at least as much credibility (validity) as the original fact (point) carried..In other words.. Argue that the data is incorrect and present data that directly disputes the original Point. Prove your point.. Just coming up with an example that the arguer presents as proof it will not work is only valid if a counter point cannot be offered..With as much validity as the original point.. Just because you disagree DOES NOT BREAK THE ARGUMENT.
Left vs Right
“A Political Ideology is a certain ethical set of ideals, principles, doctrines, myths or symbols of a social movement, institution, class, or large group that explains how society should work, and offers some political and cultural blueprint for a certain social order. A political ideology largely concerns itself with how to allocate power and to what ends it should be used. Some parties follow a certain ideology very closely, while others may take broad inspiration from a group of related ideologies without specifically embracing any one of them.”(wikipedia)
We are often stuck inside a particular belief system.. an Ideology.. It can be both Moral and Ethical, Religious or Political.. We sometimes cling to the belief system and refuse to see outside the box that ideology puts us in.. We refuse to see other points of view and view differing points of view as being unworthy or without Merit and often attack the counter belief. When we do this we stifle discourse and debate and lose all opportunity to broaden our knowledge base.
Not all Ideologies are wrong.. Conversely not all are right either. We need to be better than the ideology that ties us to one set of beliefs and leaves no room for a counter point to even be considered..
Final Thoughts
Rather you are a Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or some other affiliated or non-affiliated political or non political group. We are all facing tough times. We can dwell on was it the previous administration.. the one before it.. or is this one all we want..
The FACT is change is occurring. The question here is it the Right changes for the majority of us. Are we heading into the abyss or are we crawling out of the pit. I don’t know and I think no one does.. At least not yet.

Email me when people comment –

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

MOTUS posted a discussion
Oh dear! About that high-level email hackery that Hillary - and every talking head with a “Democrat analyst” after their name - have been blaming on the Russians? Apparently John Podesta committed his own “high level hack” by falling for the oldest…
19 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
If the Cubbies can shake off a 71 year old curse and an onslaught of naysayers to win the National League pennant to advance to the World Series than Donald J Trump can win the presidency!Sure, the real battle is still ahead for both of them, butt a…
MOTUS posted a discussion
 I’d like to file another anecdotal pre-election enthusiasm report from fly-over America. Yesterday Raj and I took a mini color tour on the backroads of the mitten state. To be fair I should point out that we steered clear of urban areas and stuck t…
MOTUS posted a discussion
The Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner is normally a genteel gathering of the New York elite; political adversaries roast each other in good humor to raise money for a Catholic children’s charity. This year however they got Trumped. There wa…
MOTUS posted a discussion
It’s late and I know many of you get up early. So this isn’t a post-debait wrap up (srdem65 promised to do that for us, if her head didn’t explode while watching) just an early morning open thread with a few random observations:Wrap up from the Fox…
MOTUS posted a discussion
I must interrupt the presidential election process to bring you this important reflection on the Obama’s last, historic State Dinner; this one for the Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi and his wife, Agnese Landini. So naturally we wore Italian (Ve…
MOTUS posted a discussion
I know this will come as a surprise: evidence emerges that journalists tend to put their money where there mouthpieces are:Irony is not dead after all, as displayed by infamous Washington Post correspondent Chris Cillizza:If IowaHawk hadn’t beaten m…
Oct 18
MOTUS posted a discussion
We all knew there was collusion between Hillary’s campaign and the media. Wikileaks confirmed it and now Sharyl Atkinson has documented it. And how could you be sentient and not think there was collusion between Hillary’s campaign and the DOJ?And th…
Oct 17

PAN on Facebook