Blogs & Discussions

NOT YET A MEMBER OF THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT'S ALTERNATIVE TO FACEBOOK? CLICK HERE TO SET UP A FREE SOCIAL PROFILE NOW!

Non-Citizen Voting

Is the Federal Government trying to preempt our States from verifying state residency and national citizenship of potential voters prior to the 2012 election?  If so, would that allow unscrupulous community organizers to scour selected neighborhoods and sign up potential applicants at four dollars per head?

 

Our Constitution specifies that all citizens 18-yrs old or above are allowed to vote in national elections, except possibly for citizens having been involved in criminal activity.  Election conduct and details are left to the States.  Details include if and how verification of state residency and/or national citizenship will take place and whether additional people might also vote.  Also specifically, a State cannot discriminate based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude or on failure to pay any tax.  [Applicable Amendments: 14th, 15th, 17th, 19th, 25th, and 26th.]

 

There is currently a movement to expand the right to vote to non-citizens.  But during our War of Independence we fought for representation.  So now it would seem inconsistent to dilute our representation by extending the vote to non-citizens.  As citizens we all have an intimate concern with the affairs of our nation; we don't know the same about non-citizens.  Indeed, it would seem more reasonable to go in the opposite direction and to limit the vote to taxpaying citizens.

 

In 1993 congress passed the National Voter Registration Act also known as the Motor Voter Act, which "required state governments to allow for registration when a qualifying voter applied for or renewed their driver's license or applied for social services." (Wikipedia)  The unfortunate thing about this Act was that no proof of citizenship was required.  So later when States would require proof, the Federal Government would claim a conflict and try to prevent the States from requiring proof.  However, the Constitution left the authority to require proof in the hands of the State.  Hence, in accordance with the 10th Amendment, it would be a violation of the Constitution for the Federal Government to restrict the States from demanding proof.

 

In 2008 this failure to require proof of residence and citizenship seems to have allowed unscrupulous community organizers to scour selected neighborhoods and sign up potential applicants at four dollars per head.  Some illegals and non-citizens were later identified.  Others were not.  The situation did and does greatly facilitate the corruption of a proper voting process.  In the case of a close election, it is particularly important to be able to establish that the voters who voted did so legally.

 

Currently, all of our States have disallowed non-citizen suffrage.  Arkansas was the last state to ban non-citizen voting in 1926. But occasionally, it is still proposed. 

 

[http://hpronline.org/united-states/voting-rights-earned-or-entitled/]

Email me when people comment –

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

MOTUS posted a discussion
This is getting confusing: was it fake news that caused Hillary to lose, or was it real news dispersed by  Russian hackers? They’re not mutually exclusive of course. The story that Russian hackers tried to help Trump win may itself be fake news - st…
7 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
Here’s a pattern you can expect to see more of in the future:Donald Trump says something.Media/Democrats decry his comment as a) untrue b) indiscreet c) unpresidential d) all of the aboveFacts reveal The Donald is correctCurrent example, this tweet:…
yesterday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Remember that time Gary Johnson didn’t know what Aleppo was? Turns out he wasn’t alone.At one time Barry didn’t know Aleppo from Alpo either; presumably before they crossed that hard to identify red line:"The ability of ISIL to not just mass inside…
Thursday
MOTUS posted a discussion
As we are all excruciatingly aware, the Left is always guilty of whatever they accuse others of. Take that War on Women for example: they own it.Check out their reaction to Kellyanne’s tweet from the “Heroes and Villains” costume party where she don…
Wednesday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Of Mice and Men. Whoops, sorry – microaggresion! “Of mice and non-gender specific humanoids.” Today’s post is dedicated to the mice, aka Special Snowflakes.Let’s start with 49ers Quarterback Colin-take-a-knee-for-our-national-anthem-Kaepernick: oddl…
Tuesday
MOTUS posted a discussion
White Privilege From People's CubeIf we didn’t vote for Obama we were racists.Taking Obama’s picture with hot sauce - Microaggresion!If we joined the Tea Party we were racists (and likely to be audited by the IRS).If we supported Herman Caine we wer…
Monday
MOTUS posted a discussion
I’ve been collecting these for a week or so, the only connection is they are all generated by various branches of the whacky left.From the Green Belt:1. Green Party switches strategy in Pennsylvania recountHours after a Green Party-backed campaign d…
Dec 4
MOTUS posted a discussion
I hereby bestow my Column of the Week – on second thought make that of the Century – award to Roger L. Simon for this: Panic in Progressive Park: What If He’s Actually Good? And while Roger’s columns are generally award worthy simply because of his…
Dec 3
More…

PAN on Facebook