Blogs & Discussions

NOT YET A MEMBER OF THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT'S ALTERNATIVE TO FACEBOOK? CLICK HERE TO SET UP A FREE SOCIAL PROFILE NOW!

Non-Citizen Voting

Is the Federal Government trying to preempt our States from verifying state residency and national citizenship of potential voters prior to the 2012 election?  If so, would that allow unscrupulous community organizers to scour selected neighborhoods and sign up potential applicants at four dollars per head?

 

Our Constitution specifies that all citizens 18-yrs old or above are allowed to vote in national elections, except possibly for citizens having been involved in criminal activity.  Election conduct and details are left to the States.  Details include if and how verification of state residency and/or national citizenship will take place and whether additional people might also vote.  Also specifically, a State cannot discriminate based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude or on failure to pay any tax.  [Applicable Amendments: 14th, 15th, 17th, 19th, 25th, and 26th.]

 

There is currently a movement to expand the right to vote to non-citizens.  But during our War of Independence we fought for representation.  So now it would seem inconsistent to dilute our representation by extending the vote to non-citizens.  As citizens we all have an intimate concern with the affairs of our nation; we don't know the same about non-citizens.  Indeed, it would seem more reasonable to go in the opposite direction and to limit the vote to taxpaying citizens.

 

In 1993 congress passed the National Voter Registration Act also known as the Motor Voter Act, which "required state governments to allow for registration when a qualifying voter applied for or renewed their driver's license or applied for social services." (Wikipedia)  The unfortunate thing about this Act was that no proof of citizenship was required.  So later when States would require proof, the Federal Government would claim a conflict and try to prevent the States from requiring proof.  However, the Constitution left the authority to require proof in the hands of the State.  Hence, in accordance with the 10th Amendment, it would be a violation of the Constitution for the Federal Government to restrict the States from demanding proof.

 

In 2008 this failure to require proof of residence and citizenship seems to have allowed unscrupulous community organizers to scour selected neighborhoods and sign up potential applicants at four dollars per head.  Some illegals and non-citizens were later identified.  Others were not.  The situation did and does greatly facilitate the corruption of a proper voting process.  In the case of a close election, it is particularly important to be able to establish that the voters who voted did so legally.

 

Currently, all of our States have disallowed non-citizen suffrage.  Arkansas was the last state to ban non-citizen voting in 1926. But occasionally, it is still proposed. 

 

[http://hpronline.org/united-states/voting-rights-earned-or-entitled/]

Email me when people comment –

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

MOTUS posted a discussion
I note there was a Trigger Warning posted at the Hofstra University debate last night:They should have added “biased opinion journalism ” to the list, in which case the “Open Your Eyes” sign on the table next to it would have made sense.My take on t…
27 minutes ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
I see that President-Stompy-Foot-in-Waiting got her special Mine-is-Bigger-Than-Yours podium for tonight’s battle of the tongues.Along with a soap box to stand on.“Lectern Power Supply” – makes you wonder what power is in this box that Hillary will…
yesterday
MOTUS posted a discussion
I’m feeling a bit whimsical today so this flight of fancy is perfect. Photographer Dylan Winter captures the glorious “murmurations” of several hundred thousand starlings as they rise and fall, arc and plane in self-organizing choreography on their…
Sunday
Red_Dirt posted a blog post
In the criminal underworld, it is not uncommon to hear thugs boast about “owning” people who their gang bosses have compromised, or “bought off.”  Very typically, the New Yorkand Chicago Sicilian Mafia speaks of “owning” judges,police, federal and s…
Sunday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Guess who changed their mind and is now going to vote for Trump?Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know: Ted Cruz. Butt this is even BIGGER! I don’t normally cover the Village Idiot butt this - this is YUGE! Kimmie Kardashian might switch her allegiance from Hilla…
Saturday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Okay, it’s official: no public appearances (including fund raisers!) until debate night.CHAPPAQUA, N.Y., Sept. 22 (UPI) -- Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has cleared her public campaign schedule as of Thursday to focus on preparing…
Friday
MOTUS posted a discussion
I see that #HilzHiatus has rolled their candidate out this week to prove she’s not a hologram:Although I noted in the Orlando appearance she avoided the usual side-to-side teleprompter reading - in order to avoid any more commentary on her wonky eye…
Thursday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Let’s review the FBI’s track record over the past 3 years:They investigated the Boston Bombers and found no reason for concern, thereby clearing any hurdles in the path of the Tsarnaev brothers to accomplish their goal of wreaking death and havoc on…
Sep 21
More…

PAN on Facebook