Standing against big government and for the people!

6 QUESTIONS FOR CLINTON ABOUT BENGHAZI - AMERICAN THINKER

Scott Varland

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has agreed to testify on the Benghazi debacle before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. The hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, January 23, two days after President Obama is inaugurated.

I doubt that very many journalists and citizens will closely follow the hearing held so soon after the inauguration. But even so, I have some questions that a member of the Committee may want to ask. (Of course, these questions are the tip of the iceberg.)

1. On October 15, 2012, did you take responsibility for the lapses in Benghazi security that resulted in the 9/11/12 murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

2. Do you take responsibility for the State Department not improving security or withdrawing after terrorists exploded two bombs (one in April 2012 and the other in June 2012) at the American Benghazi diplomatic post?

3. Do you take responsibility for the State Department not improving security or withdrawing after a May 2012 terrorist attack on the Red Cross in Benghazi that caused the organization to withdraw effective August 6, 2012?

4. Do you take responsibility for the State Department not improving security or withdrawing after an attempted assassination of the British Ambassador in Benghazi on June 10, 2012, that resulted in the withdrawal of all British consular staff that same month?

5. Do you take responsibility for the State Department not improving security or withdrawing after American officials on the ground in Benghazi expressed security concerns in the months prior to 9/11/12?

6. Do you take responsibility for the failure to rescue the Americans during the fighting that lasted several hours? If you do not take responsibility, then who is responsible?

Tags: American, Benghazi, Clinton, Thinker, questions

Comment

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Join Patriot Action Network

Comment by Linda Stewart on January 23, 2013 at 9:12pm: Saw Rand Paul question her. She was ticked! She has a smart aleck attitude for somebody with blood on their hands.

Comment by Judith Hannan on January 23, 2013 at 6:26pm: 6. Do you take responsibility for the failure to rescue the Americans during the fighting that lasted several hours? If you do not take responsibility, then who is responsible?

According to Tony Shaffer (Retired Army Col) The President is the only one authorized to give a "stand-down" order! Any more questions?!!!.

Comment by David L. Fisher on January 23, 2013 at 7:54am: We're still not asking the right question. With whom did the stand down order originate? Trace it back up the chain of command. I suspect it originated with the President. We want to know and we want to know why. It, in my opini;on, was given to cover up the fact that we were supplying arms to terroists and thusly those 4 people were forced to sacrfice their lives to cover it up. According to my information, a general in Africa was in the process of sending help even though he was disobeying the stand down order and was replaced. Who has the power to replace a general?

In the end, whomsoever gave the original order is guilty of treason and should be tried in military court for the MURDERS of these four brave souls.

Comment by Steven Newman on January 22, 2013 at 11:22pm: #7. If you accept responsibility for all the above when will you submit your resignation, effective immediately?