At one time or other we all complain about "bias in the news."
The fact is, despite the journalistic ideal of "objectivity,"
every news story is influenced by the attitudes and
background of its interviewers, writers, photographers
Not all bias is deliberate. But you can become a more aware
news reader or viewer by watching for the following
journalistic techniques that allow bias to "creep in" to the news:
Bias through selection and omission
An editor can express a bias by choosing to use or not to use a specific news item. Within a given story, some details can be ignored, and others included, to give readers or viewers a different opinion about the events reported. If, during a speech, a few people boo, the reaction can be described as "remarks greeted by jeers" or they can be ignored as "a handful of dissidents."
Bias through omission is difficult to detect. Only by comparing news reports from a wide variety of outlets can the form of bias be observed.
Bias through placement
Readers of papers judge first page
stories to be more significant than those buried in the back. Television and radio newscasts run the most important stories first and leave the less significant for later. Where a story is placed, therefore, influences what a reader or viewer thinks about its importance.
Many people read only the headlines of a
news item. Most people scan nearly all the headlines in a newspaper. Headlines are the most-read part of a paper. They can summarize as well as present carefully hidden bias and prejudices. They can convey excitement where little exists. They can express approval or condemnation.
Bias by photos, captions and camera angles
pictures flatter a person, others make the person look unpleasant. A
paper can choose photos to influence opinion about, for example, a
candidate for election. On television, the choice of which visual images
to display is extremely important. The captions newspapers run below
photos are also potential sources of bias.
use of names and titles
News media often use labels and
titles to describe people, places, and events. A person can be called an "ex-con" or be referred to as someone who "served time twenty years ago for a minor offense." Whether a person is described as a "terrorist" or a "freedom fighter" is a clear indication of editorial bias.
through statistics and crowd counts
To make a disaster
seem more spectacular (and therefore worthy of reading about), numbers can be inflated. "A hundred injured in aircrash" can be the same as "only minor injuries in air crash," reflecting the opinion of the person doing the counting.
Bias by source control
detect bias, always consider where the news item "comes from." Is the
information supplied by a reporter, an eyewitness, police or fire
officials, executives, or elected or appointed government officials?
Each may have a particular bias that is introduced into the story.
Companies and public relations directors supply news outlets with
puffpieces through news releases, photos or videos. Often news outlets
depend on pseudo-events (demonstrations, sit-ins, ribbon cuttings,
speeches and ceremonies) that take place mainly to gain news coverage.
choice and tone
Showing the same kind of bias that
appears in headlines, the use of positive or negative words or words with a particular connotation can strongly influence the reader or viewer.