Newest Activity

When this first popped up in the news, I thought, what would this do for business? There in the Empire State, where one of the nastiest gun grabbing laws in recent history was passed last month, USA Today reported some gun companies were refusing to do business with law enforcement agencies, claiming that they supported the citizens and the second amendment more than the government.

Some gun manufacturers say they will no longer sell their firearms to New York law enforcement agencies after the state passed a broad assault-weapons ban last month.

At least five companies have said they won’t sell to New York police since Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the Safe Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act in January. The bill, known as the NY SAFE Act, included a ban on any semi-automatic rifles or shotguns with “military-style” features, such as a pistol grip or a folding stock. Read More:

The police and other government agencies don’t typically have cops just walk into the store to buy something. They usually buy in bulk on a contract that goes through the Request For Proposals (RFP) process where the manufacturer or a wholesale distributor provides bids on what they will sell to the agency and for what price.

Besides, if it’s a gun store in a place like NY – he already can’t sell those weapons locally, so he’s not likely to have anything in the store anyway.

"Nothing we’re going to do is going to fundamentally alter or eliminate the possibility of another mass shooting or guarantee that we will bring gun deaths down to a thousand a year from what we’re at now,” -Biden told reporters after meeting with Senate Democrats in the Capitol-.

I support these manufacturers with my wallet, and hope the others follow their lead.

But I don’t think there’s anything illegal about the companies refusing to sell to these law enforcement agencies. And it still seems likely that all of the agencies will still find somebody to sell to them.

No shirt
No shoes
No 2nd Amendment
No service
******************

I wonder how the gun-grabbers will sneer about this. Maybe something like, “These companies are endangering the public!” What a load of CRAP.........

The problem is, that as many as oppose the new firearms regulation also support them.

Police chiefs back Obama gun-laws plan


San Diego Police Chief Supports Greater Gun Regulation

Arizona’s Kiss Tactical’s Facebook page also carries a story about denying a California police officer’s request to purchase an AR-15.

Wonder if this continues with the gun businesses, will bho/holder get their face involved to ‘put the gun companies’ in their place? Will they try to put them out of business ‘for the greater good’?
I would not put it past them if they thought they could.

As citizens, this is one of the few actual powers we have left…the take away. We should use it more often considering such a high level of corruption taking place, shouldn’t hold back any more.

Police and first responders shouldn’t need guns now, after all, the law says it will be safe now. No market there now. /// What a FARCE.....

The Government loves to see this kind outrage because it just allows them to push their agenda further to the point they will take complete control of gun manufacturing then they will control new guns.

We need to stop this government from becoming a dictatorship and we must do it NOW..........

You need to be a member of Patriot Action Network to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Newest Members (Say Hello!)

Today's News

Latest Network Activity

MOTUS posted a discussion
I’m feeling a bit whimsical today so this flight of fancy is perfect. Photographer Dylan Winter captures the glorious “murmurations” of several hundred thousand starlings as they rise and fall, arc and plane in self-organizing choreography on their…
9 hours ago
Red_Dirt posted a blog post
In the criminal underworld, it is not uncommon to hear thugs boast about “owning” people who their gang bosses have compromised, or “bought off.”  Very typically, the New Yorkand Chicago Sicilian Mafia speaks of “owning” judges,police, federal and s…
12 hours ago
MOTUS posted a discussion
Guess who changed their mind and is now going to vote for Trump?Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know: Ted Cruz. Butt this is even BIGGER! I don’t normally cover the Village Idiot butt this - this is YUGE! Kimmie Kardashian might switch her allegiance from Hilla…
yesterday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Okay, it’s official: no public appearances (including fund raisers!) until debate night.CHAPPAQUA, N.Y., Sept. 22 (UPI) -- Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has cleared her public campaign schedule as of Thursday to focus on preparing…
Friday
MOTUS posted a discussion
I see that #HilzHiatus has rolled their candidate out this week to prove she’s not a hologram:Although I noted in the Orlando appearance she avoided the usual side-to-side teleprompter reading - in order to avoid any more commentary on her wonky eye…
Thursday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Let’s review the FBI’s track record over the past 3 years:They investigated the Boston Bombers and found no reason for concern, thereby clearing any hurdles in the path of the Tsarnaev brothers to accomplish their goal of wreaking death and havoc on…
Wednesday
Larry Holland posted a discussion
Absolutely no good will come from Obama handing control of the Internet to the UN, which will just immediately hand it over to China! So why did no one ask the President, how will it ever benefit America, by doing so? Well, no one asked that questio…
Tuesday
MOTUS posted a discussion
Today is the last time Barry’s motorcade and entourage will foul up Manhattan traffic all day in order to address the United Nations General Assembly. It will be the last time as President he will be able to use the UN backdrop to apologize for Amer…
Tuesday
More…

PAN on Facebook