Standing against big government and for the people!

A Dangerous Pivot Happening In White House Narrative Re: 2nd Amendment

From Our Liberty News Network:

Published: January 23, 2013

If there is one thing we’ve learned over the past few years, it’s that the Chicago machine that now rules Washington will go to any lengths to get what it wants. It will bully you, push you around and ultimately demonize you in to destruction if that is a requirement for continued power.

We’ve seen this for five years now. They knew a rich Capitalist who supported the core of Obamacare could be pinned down and kicked in the head until destruction was present. They wanted Romney the whole time, and they got him. Then, they destroyed him.

Post election we now see Obama’s Chicago machine setting its eyes on conservatism as a whole. It’s no longer about influential individuals who stand in his way. It’s now about half of the nation who stands in his way. And he’s going to demonize us and work towards our ultimate destruction.

The key here, and the part that most Republicans and conservative “leaders” will miss, is that Obama will accomplish this through crafty use of our language and message marketing 101. You see, their team has already successfully beaten us down with words that project an image we cannot safely oppose (yet). Words like progress, forward, fairness, equality, change for instance. The use of these words alone insinuate those who do not embrace them are opposed to them. Are conservatives genuinely trying to create an unfair world? Are we seriously trying to make America unequal? According to half the country, we are. And this is all thanks to the most divisive President in the history of our nation.

Be warned, friends. Obama’s Chicago machine is about to take it to a whole new level. In his inaugural speech Barack Obama used a plethora of code words. Perhaps our crew will analyze and report on them in the coming days. But until we can, let’s look at one of the most profound words to come out of the day.

Absolutism: An absolute doctrine, principle, or standard

The NRA boss picked up on this and had quite a bit to say about it. Wayne LaPierre knows full well this is leading to an epic war surrounding the 2nd Amendment. Those who think Obama’s soft announcement on his “Executive Actions” last week will be the end of it are badly mistaken. Obama has been plans, and they don’t involve him giving up on his effort to weaken, if not completely dismantle the 2nd Amendment.

Keep in mind that while many of Obama’s actions seem abrupt and surprising for us, he actually performs them in a very methodical manner. Every move is calculated. Every move is carefully crafted as part of a grander scheme. We won’t ever see a press conference with Obama saying he will sign something that destroys the 2nd Amendment in one stroke. He’ll carefully deconstruct it piece by piece over the next four years.

Obama’s use of the word absolute is telling of his upcoming war of narratives. He’s pivoting to back us into a corner where we are seen as irrational and unable to be fluid in our views. He’s painting himself as a guy who feels pain for victims of violent crime, while we allegedly ignore that pain and immediately raise our firearms in the air with pro-2nd amendment signs in our hands.

In Obama’s eyes, and the eyes of the loyalists who blindly follow him, Obama is the healer and the rest of us are unfair, regressive, uncaring absolutists.

In a post-speech press conference White House thug Jay Carney was asked about Obama’s liberalism clearly present in his speech. Carney answered with this.

CARNEY: I would reject the idea that this was an “ism” speech. This was in fact the opposite of that . . .

And I hardly think that pursuit of equal rights, pursuit of comprehensive immigration reform, pursuit of sensible policies that deal with climate change and enhance our energy independence are ideological. The only “ism” that was a part of that speech was his rejection of absolutism . . .

Q Not on behalf of liberalism or progressivism?

CARNEY: Of course not. It’s on behalf of ideas that represent who we are as Americans. I mean, if you’re suggesting that it’s — I would reject the idea that pursuit of equal rights is a Democratic-only pursuit. Or pursuit of energy legislation that enhances our independence, increases our production of domestic forms of energy and addresses climate change is only a province of liberalism or the Democratic Party. I think — I would hope — I know that Republicans would reject that, too.

So this is his vision for how we can move together forward.

Catch that? Obama’s rejection of absolutism? In essence, this is a confession that Obama outright rejects the position of tens of millions, if not over a hundred million Americans that he is bound by oath to represent. So is this President actually “rejecting” potentially half of all American citizens? Is he truly that divisive?

Obama’s effort to paint the position of rights guaranteed by the Constitution as unacceptable absolutism puts the entire structure of government and the entire conservative movement on notice. The Supreme Court will now think twice before becoming labeled “absolutists.” The House and Senate will cower at TV ads pinning them to the absolutists movement.

Conservatives need to be thinking of this preemptively. We need to be fully aware this is what lies ahead and have a strategy in place to help side-step the attack and be ready with a counter move. Otherwise we’re going to find ourselves in a dark corner wondering what happened and how we lost it all.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Georgia K. Pierce on January 23, 2013 at 11:52pm

Americans fight best when backed into a corner..... turn the rednecks loose .....lol

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DENNIS YOUNG on January 24, 2013 at 12:20am

I think the liberals are telling their liberal whackos to start all these killing sprees to help get rid of guns. They never tell us what web sites these people are visiting,, ever notice?? We never hear what groups they belong to, if they are conservatives or liberals etc etc.... We know they are all liberal democrats and none of them belong to the NRA. There is something funny here that all these attacks are taking place since Ovomit has been in office. They tried the Fast and Furious trick to make us think guns were killing people in Mexico... Remember how the news media was constantly talking about all the crime in Mexico before Fast and Furious???? And now they never talk about it anymore??? But, now, we have all these mass killings,,, by gasp, liberal democrats!!! And now the media is constantly talking about these mass murders, but never mention they are done by liberal democrats!!,,,,, I smell a conspiracy by the media and the white house,,,,,

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Koski on January 24, 2013 at 12:27am

I read that James Holmes was part of Occupy Wall Street Black Ops. Type in and you will find info. Also Sandy Hook "killer" was a registered democrat as were his parents. Same with Columbine shooters...parents registered democrats. But, I tried to look up any info about shooters on social media right after Sandy Hook shooter was identified and nothing showed up. My guess is they prescrub any social network info so you can't see if they belong to Occupy Wall Street which is my best guess. I saw a leaked video of Bill Ayers and some OWS students talking in a parking garage last year and the students asked Bill "when should we start the violence"? It looks like they may have started the violence. We need to get some proof somehow.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lynnie Redd on January 24, 2013 at 4:10pm

Yes, this "created violence" BY the Liberals needs to be CRACKED WIDE OPEN!~

If you look at the videos of the different "episodes of violence", you will find some amazingly obvious

inconsistencies, crisis actors, etc.being orchestrated.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Caroline Frost on January 24, 2013 at 12:45am

There was another lock down at a college in Virginia tonite, I saw it on the Greta VanSustern Show. It's funny how all these killings have come out since Obungler took office.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Janice E on January 24, 2013 at 1:05am

Dennis...these thoughts have run through my mind too. Everything you wrote above I believe to be fact.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SamAdams on January 24, 2013 at 10:48am

This conspiracy is practically out in the open. Most media will continue as they always have, especially in the last five years and back the Fraud in his quest to remove resistance to his power grab. The left is in love with the centralization of power because it means that their superior ideas can be force down our throats. Eventually, the "wrong" ideas will get forced down their throats, but by then it will be TOO LATE.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dennis V on January 24, 2013 at 12:59pm

I don't want to sound like a kook, and I have no evidence, but is it possible that there are subliminal messages being posed to gamers. It would seem that those individuals who are deeply engrossed in a "game" might be susceptible to suggestions of violence in the real world.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Barbara F. Amos on January 24, 2013 at 4:34pm

I have wondered about the same thing. When a person is intent upon evil they will use any and every tool, opportunity, person, situation, etc to achieve their goals. That seems like a definition of Communism, too. By the way, David Axelrod, Obama's Chicago thug in chief, is a Communist. His mother wrote for a Communist newspaper. He is what is appropriately called a "red diaper baby". He is exactly what Obama is, a person doing exactly what they were brought up to be and doing what they were taught to do to further the goals of Communism. Valerie Jarrett, the other half of Obama's brain, also has strong Communist ties via her in-laws. Her father-in-law was a Communist of some note in Chicago. Jarrett, herself, was born in Iran, not the U.S. Of course, there is always the presence of Bill Ayers who brags about his anti-American violent past and he has been a tenured professor, enabling him to warp the minds of his students with his Communism. His family had Obama as a house guest when he was a "poor" student according to the postman who delivered mail to them at that particular time. Chicago is the safe haven of Communism in the U.S. and is a cesspool of evil. It is no wonder that politics in Illinois are rife with corruption.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bob Lee on January 24, 2013 at 1:38pm

Georgia, The Battle of the Bulge is one example.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vladimir ValCymbal on January 23, 2013 at 11:58pm

America has one chance only and that is elect a veto-proof Congress dedicated to our Constitution.

We all must volunteer to serve on local and state executive committees, vet candidates, walk precincts, work phone banks to elect a veto-proof congress, and then keep in touch with them to make sure they keep the faith of the campaign.